When considering the organization formerly known as NARAL Pro-Choice America, now Reproductive Freedom for All, a crucial question arises: How do we respond to the argument that denying access to abortion equates to denying reproductive freedom?
In the newest CareCast episode, Roland Warren, Care Net’s President and CEO, and Vincent DiCaro, Care Net’s Chief Outreach Officer, discuss the language and what’s really at stake when you look closer at the abortion debate. Listen to the latest CareCast.
Listen to the newest CareCast: Unpacking the Language of Reproductive Freedom
The above link sends you to SoundCloud, you can also find this episode on iTunes and Spotify.
#1 Defining Reproductive Freedom
We must define reproductive freedom as it is—the ability to choose whether or not to reproduce. Logically, this concept should refer to the right to conceive or not to conceive. Sadly, the abortion debate often shifts this definition to include the right to terminate a pregnancy, which is an entirely different matter.
#2 Noticing the Euphemisms
The terms “reproductive rights” and “reproductive freedom” are often used as euphemisms in the abortion debate. These phrases avoid directly addressing the reality of abortion—the termination of a human life. Don’t miss the challenge these euphemisms create for having clear and honest discussion.
Understanding the power of language is crucial in the abortion debate. By asking critical questions and unpacking terms, we can engage in more meaningful discussions about the true nature of reproductive freedom and what it means in today’s society.