In the newest LifeChat, Roland Warren invites us to look beyond the headlines and ask the deeper question: Why are we fighting to restrict the abortion pill?

The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) released a study of over 865,000 women who took the abortion pill. Their data reveal that the risk of suffering serious adverse events was over 10%–in sharp contrast to the FDA’s claim of 0.5%. 

Part 1 of a 4-Part Series on Being Pro Abundant Life from 2016, updated 2025 As you may know, I served for 11 years as President of the National Fatherhood Initiative. During that time countless people asked me, in one form or another, what it means to be a good dad....

You helped unite a family and lead them to Christ! She didn’t know why (yet), but right before her scheduled abortion, Katie* just needed someone to talk to . . . someone who’d listen to everything she had to say. Someone to hopefully give her not just advice, but...

According to a new study from the Ethics and Policy Center, the rate of serious health complications following mifepristone abortions is at least 22 times higher than the number found on current drug labels.

Hector Juarez’s journey has taken him from serving as a full-time pastor and pregnancy center volunteer to leading men’s ministry at the center, and now he is into his seventh year as the Executive Director of Hope Pregnancy Center in Ontario, Oregon—just across the border from Idaho.

What if the biggest argument against the abortion pill is the one we rarely lead with? While recent data reveals alarming risks to women’s health—including a serious adverse event rate of over 11 percent—the greatest danger of the abortion pill lies elsewhere.

Words matter. Language shapes how we see the world. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the way the pro-choice movement has reframed pregnancy—not as pro-creation, but as co-creation.