In the newest CareCast episode, Roland Warren, President and CEO of Care Net, and Vincent DiCaro, Chief Outreach Officer at Care Net, discuss why the pro-life movement must engage in this new battleground: defining who deserves rights.
Biblical truth is clear—every human is made in God’s image, and personhood is not something earned. In this episode, Warren and DiCaro expose how pro-choice advocates are reframing the debate and how pro-lifers can effectively respond.
Listen to CareCast: Redefining Personhood—Why Pro-Lifers Must Stand Against This Dangerous Shift
The above link sends you to SoundCloud, you can also find this episode on iTunes and Spotify.
Listen in as Roland and Vincent discuss the following, and much more:
3 Key Talking Points:
#1 The Debate Has Shifted: Pro-choice advocates no longer argue when life begins; instead, they debate who qualifies for rights.
#2 Dangers of the Personhood Argument: History shows that when the powerful define who is a “person,” the vulnerable suffer—whether in slavery, genocide, or abortion.
#3 Biblical Truth vs. Cultural Lies: The Bible affirms that personhood is intrinsic, not based on abilities or societal definitions.
Impactful Ideas from this episode:
- It’s no longer about when life begins. It’s about who gets to decide if that life matters.
- Peter Singer admits life begins at conception. But to him, that’s not enough to justify protection.
- The moment we define personhood based on ability; we allow the powerful to strip away human rights.